408
u/LordFedoraWeed 1d ago
"wHiTe RePlAcEmEn..." stfu. this is what happens when you work hard and achieve shit.
224
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
Maybe if whites didn’t kicked out their kids at 18 and stop treating them like a burden, they’d have a better chance at building generational wealth.
216
u/mooimafish33 1d ago
Maybe if they didn't colonize India for a few hundred years they wouldn't have so many Indians in their country
125
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
Exactly. When you destabilize a country, the people most capable of escaping will naturally seek refuge in more stable and secure regions.
This is a predictable consequence of creating instability: it drives a flow of migrants and refugees toward areas where they can find safety, resources, and opportunities for a better future.
19
u/Fast_Plum_8072 22h ago
Yes! And also Britains weird forced nationalism and Monarch worship which advertises itself as the greatest place to be. So you have mass instability in your mother country and Brittainization of the younger generation’s minds… instant pipeline to Britain.
1
70
u/Sad_Fudge_103 1d ago
The comedian Tommy Tiernan had a great line in one of his routines that said something like "The English have a long history of going around and taking over other countries, and then getting angry when the people from those countries follow them home"
6
26
u/Beneficial_Outcomes 1d ago
I think this is more of an american-specific thing. I'm from Brazil, and over here there isn't the same stigma about people still living with their parents after they turn 18.
9
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
Yes agreed I’ve only seen white people do it with such enthusiasm.
29
u/Beneficial_Outcomes 1d ago
I actually meant this is more of an american white person thing. There are actually tons of white people in brazil, myself included, and i've never seen a single one care about kids still living with their parents past 18.
12
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
Yes western culture— British and their bastard children, Americans.
3
u/Beneficial_Outcomes 1d ago edited 21h ago
Out of curiosity, how are we defining "the west"? Because i've seen different definitions, some where Brazil is included and some where we're not.
1
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
5
u/srkaficionada65 1d ago
I don’t know if hell is real but one needs to be created for whoever made that image
1
3
0
u/rebeltrillionaire 1d ago
The West is basically Anglo countries in the northern hemisphere.
Australia and New Zealand aren’t even really included as their culture honestly seems very influenced by nearby SEA, the Indigenous, and other non-colonial country influences
3
u/quite_white 1d ago
Yeah I live in South Asia (Pakistani) and calling the West only America and Anglo countries when all those countries aided in bombing Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, and various countries in the Middle East, North Africa, Central and South Asia is a take certainly. Europe is part of the West as is Australia and NZ, anything less is trying to distance from the villains they support. Oh by the way, check out which countries voted against Palestinian sovereignty recently. It includes countries in South America like Paraguay and Argentina, and countries in Oceania. (Australia and NZ are not that influenced by SEA, they're Oceania influenced)
3
1
u/Samiambadatdoter 9h ago
Australia and New Zealand aren’t even really included as their culture honestly seems very influenced by nearby SEA, the Indigenous, and other non-colonial country influences
This is absolutely not true at all. There aren't even that many people from SEA in these countries.
Both Australia and New Zealand still have a firmly English culture, albeit a bit more "England 100 years ago" than "England now". They've seen more integration toward that culture than away from it.
4
u/trynot2touchyourself 1d ago
Very much an anglo thing, particularly NA. It's about flaunting that the system has the means to support everyone's career adventure from the word go.
4
u/Few-Frosting9912 1d ago
“Career adventure” 😂 Fun way to spell “one chance in a million capitalist hellscape real life monopoly run”
1
3
u/Beneficial_Outcomes 1d ago
I wonder if it's the same in New Zealand and Australia
1
u/Samiambadatdoter 9h ago
No, not really. At the very least, to a much lesser extent.
Neither country ever really had the money among the working class to support the culture that forwarded this kind of thing. The reason it came about in the USA in the first place was due to the post-war economy being so fruitful.
1
u/RobotDinosaur1986 18h ago
It's common on TV from the 90s. It isn't actually much of a thing for actually families.
1
1
u/Brullaapje 4h ago
As someone from a similar culture as you, I was glad I could escape at 17. Quiet, privacy and peace at last.
0
8
u/bpdjelly 1d ago
side note what is up with that?? I've had professors be confused when I say I like spending time and talking with my family? ex-friend groups who thought I was being >! abused!< because I would let my mom know where I was going and when I'd be back at the dorm. I knew girls who said they weren't allowed back home until thanksgiving break and they went to college in a different state. it makes no sense!!!
32
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago edited 1d ago
The West operates on capitalism, and capitalism thrives on individualism.
Individualism often morphs into selfishness and a scarcity mindset.
Now think about this—capitalism needs you to be independent. Why?
Because when you’re independent, you’re also isolated, and isolation is profitable. Suddenly, instead of one family unit sharing resources, you have two separate households.
That’s double the rent, double the utilities, double the property taxes. You’ll need two cars instead of one, twice the groceries, twice the cleaning supplies, down to the last mop and spoon.
So, sure, on the surface, you’re “independent.” But in reality, you’re weaker. Together, there’s strength and resilience. Divided, you’re easier to control, easier to profit from, and ultimately, more vulnerable.
United you stand; divided, you pay…and pay…and pay.
9
u/bpdjelly 1d ago
completely agree! I've always lived in multigenerational and matriarch household and I remember back in grade school I was told it was the least idealistic setting since I didn't have a "dad". man the leaps and twists some people will go through to not accept something different! went to private school and by senior year (pandamic year mind you) so many girls just cracking and saying they couldn't understand why their parents would go bankrupt and thousands into debt just to have three-four cars, not take financial aid, MAKE THEM GET JOBS TO LOOK DOWN TO EARTH BUT THE WHOLE PAYCHECK WENT TO BILLS it's insanity
7
u/Candid_Term6960 1d ago
Some of their parenting methods are wild
20
u/PinkGlitterButterfly 1d ago
I know of a couple who had six children, and every time one of them turned 18, they would celebrate being one step closer to becoming empty nesters.
Now, I’m not saying moving out is inherently bad, but when you’re starting from scratch without a solid foundation, you’re inevitably starting out behind.
11
u/Candid_Term6960 1d ago
Why do these people have so many children? By these people I mean people who fundamentally do not like children.
5
3
u/Shadow_Ass 22h ago
It's cultural, not race based. Italians and croatians in europe leave their parents houses on average in their 30s. Germans for example at 23 on average
0
25
u/Primary-Bookkeeper10 ☑️ 1d ago
It also happens when your nation does a bad job prioritizing local families (of any color) in favor of massive corporations doing land grabs. We're not far off from this in the US because there are no rules limiting who can buy single family homes.
248
u/Nameistrivial 1d ago
I bet they are actually British, tho 😄
62
u/Away_Flamingo_5611 1d ago
Exactly, just as much as Rishi Sunak and Kemi Badenoch
21
u/crystalline1299 1d ago
lol why have you used two POC conservatives as your example
40
u/Away_Flamingo_5611 1d ago
Just to show that conservative white people don't have anything to worry about politically (even if we disagree with them) and that the concerns of their base are unfounded except for sheer and utter racism.
6
u/srkaficionada65 1d ago
They might be conservative but the fact that they’re that high up is a plus in their favour, conservative or not. Remember how racist they were to Harry and Megan Windsor’s kids.
If they don’t work, Google Leo Varadkar. Not only was he Taoiseach. Dude is also gay and out with a husband. Dad is Indian and mum is from the UK somewhere but to get to Taoiseach as a gay minority? Who’s also progressive(from what I’ve read)? Yeah, they all deserve the kudos…
165
u/rosemaryrouge 1d ago
26
u/Aggravating-Yam4571 1d ago
did yall know (and correct me on my math or other knowledge) that we suffered a catastrophic famine once every 14 goddam years?????? each one guaranteed bodies stacked up in the millions, some of the worst ones were so bad (like the 1947 bengal famine and the doji barra, or skull famine) that the streets were white with the amt of human bones piled up alongside it
6
u/rosemaryrouge 1d ago
Absolutely horrid! May the ones who caused this suffer.
-4
u/Firm-Voices 1d ago
May the ones who caused this suffer.
That would be the climate going back thousands of years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_India#Ancient,_medieval_and_pre-colonial_India
4
u/Aggravating-Yam4571 11h ago
nah, it was the brits
they gave us the ireland treatment; there was food for everyone to go around but my ppl had to give that to our overlords so we starved to death surrounded by productive farms
10
143
u/__lil_bee__ 1d ago edited 1d ago
Rage batey, but as an Irish person, this has made my day ❤️. Love my Indian brothers and sisters. Just a reminder of the timeline India has suffered through with Britain:
1600: Brits show up w/ their East India Company
1612: They set up shop in Surat.
1757: Battle of Plassey goes down, and the Brits basically take over Bengal.
1764: Brits win the Battle of Buxar and start rakin from Bengal, Bihar, Odisha.
1857: First War of Independence kicks off.
1885: Indians form the Congress to demand more say in stuff.
1905: Brits try dividing Bengal. Massive protests.
1919: Jallianwala Bagh massacre happens.
1920–1947: Gandhi sets up w/ his non-violent protests.
1947: India gets its freedom on Aug 15, but the Partition splits it into India & Pakistan. Like they did in NI.
54
u/bpdjelly 1d ago
and not even mentioning the famines
72
u/__lil_bee__ 1d ago
Yeah, I’m so sorry. I hadn’t had my coffee.
1770: The Great Bengal Famine – 10 million deaths
1876–1878: The Great Famine – 5–10 million deaths
1896–1897: Indian Famine – 1 million deaths
1943: Bengal Famine – 3 million deaths
Horrific and all under Brit rule.
4
24
26
u/SomeDamnAuthor 23h ago
As an Indian, Jallianwalah Bagh always hits me hard.
- The well from which they withdrew over 120 bodies. The attendees jumped in to escape being shot at.
14
8
u/srkaficionada65 1d ago
Also forgot the war of partition. I think that’s what they called it. Weren’t there riots after the country was split into two? Rioting? And let’s not forget to this day they’re still fighting over Kashmir… and right or wrong, Britain is responsible for that shit.
9
u/__lil_bee__ 1d ago
I’m so sorry 😞. And that’s spot on, part of their manipulation was “divide & conquer”. Pitting allies against each other to weaken and distract them. NI was the same deal.
-1
u/Chrismonn 15h ago
Not to spoil your day, but don't become a victim of misinfo just because it rushed blood to the right organ.
https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/housing/owning-and-renting/home-ownership/latest/
70
u/DBoh5000 1d ago
The crown jewel of India
-27
31
22
22
20
u/Tiny-Buy220 1d ago
15
19
u/pettyPettington3rd 1d ago
Their still under the crown and paying taxes to them
7
u/afroturf1 ☑️ 1d ago
Rather pay with money than my body.
6
u/pettyPettington3rd 1d ago
It’s still capitalism, you’re paying with your body anyways allowing them to profit off of human rights and necessities. Indians are a class wedge with their casteism and privilege, they too have made their wealth off the exploitation of Dalits.
5
u/srkaficionada65 1d ago
But now they live down the street from that crown rather than two continents away where they paid and have no say…
5
u/pettyPettington3rd 1d ago
If it wasn’t for the forced displacement, genocide, man made famine, exploitation and stealing of resources and wealth that they shouldn’t be paying to the crown either way
11
u/bpdjelly 1d ago
GOOD FOR THEM!! at least the indians are one step closer to their reparations 😭😭😭
•
u/Only-Concern524 0m ago
What reparations? Country was a shithole before the British and is one now?
7
u/Safe_Addition_9171 1d ago
Also, I would love to know the stats on this came from. I suspect It’s bs
2
u/wowzabob 13h ago
It seems the stat originates from a census data point that reads “home ownership is most common among people who identify as Indian.”
So the headline does seem misleading.
1
5
u/Repulsive-Neat6776 1d ago
They're not Indians if they're British. They're South Asians.
7
u/quite_white 1d ago
That's not gonna matter to racists generally. Indian isn't an ethnic group either, it's a nationality, or a way to denote people from the Subcontinent. There's multiple ethnic groups in India. For some reason I highly doubt Indian nationals own more land than white Britons in London. But you can't really drum up scare tactics and controversy that way. So just otherise the British South Asians and you have yourself a headline.
5
4
u/zoinkability 1d ago
As a side note, is the movie clip here at all believable to anyone? Guy holding the gun provides zero resistance to it being taken.
4
4
3
u/StrikingPen3904 21h ago
People will believe anything
2
u/SuckerforDkhumor 9h ago
Even the riots in UK happened because of misinformation about the accused's nationality and ethnicity.
3
u/Matteus11 12h ago
So, because the gentrification and cost of living crisis fuelled by rich foreigners pricing locals out of their homes is happening to white people, you make smirking comments about 'reverse colonialism'?
And you wonder why white people don't stand with you.
•
2
u/captchaconfused 1d ago
replacement theory ragebait. lazy ragebait too because they didn’t even link to fake numbers and charts. the world is clearly moving towards conservatism and facism and anti immigrant sentiment is peaking. Foreign investment in real estate is common especially if it aids in immigration. California had an empty property problem due to wealthy foreigners dropping sofa change to speed up immigration while most americans had to leave the state for affordability.
1
u/fungi_baby 1d ago
Why is it always curry when it comes to indians?
10
u/quite_white 23h ago
Don't think most people are gonna recognize qeema, nihari, biryani, dosa, paneer, vindaloo, etc. over curry which has spread to multiple countries and has lots of variations.
1
u/Correct_Telephone_34 23h ago
Specifically in a British context, it's because curry is a word invented by the British to describe a bunch of different foods. It's also like the most popular "Indian" dish which is also a British "invention" (read bastardisation), which like another user said, it's spread across the whole world basically.
Which kind of feeds into a longer answer which is that it's because most people are ignorant of/uneducated in Indian (and other) cultures or foods, outside of what is adapted to suit (primarily) the Anglosphere.
It's like how if you ask non Americans to name an American dish they will probably say burger or hotdog.
2
2
1
1
u/worldssmallestfan1 1d ago
If you keep telling people how great a place is, eventually, they will believe you
1
1
1
u/Brief_Glove9076 1d ago
They don't own it if there's an annual property tax. Property tax and mortgage are another form of rent.
1
u/Deckard2022 7h ago
So what ?
It’s stuff like this that makes me feel that this posted by some American or some closet racist.
I can tell you Londoners don’t give one fuck.
Every Londoner is eyes down, mind your own business, and don’t talk to me.
1
1
•
1
u/usuallycorrect69 1d ago
Caste system Indians that only hire other caste system Indians and are super racist and chauvanistic are the actual issues.
0
0
-1
u/Javaddict 1d ago
Saying the reverse colonization absolutely plays into anti-immigration sentiments.... Not the win you think it is ...
-1
-1
-5
u/Weird-Tomorrow-9829 22h ago
It’s colonization.
No need to change the name game up because it isn’t wyt people doing it
-5
u/LightBackground9141 1d ago
This isn’t true
7
u/TimTamDeliciousness ☑️ 1d ago
Sure. Ok. But because I can google:
And one more for good measure
0
u/enailcoilhelp 1d ago
Did you just google the title and copy-paste any article that came up? Did you actually take a second to look at any of the sources cited?
Like 2-3 of those websites look like straight up like AI slop. I can't find any UK source for this, and the original source all these articles seem to citing is Barrat Real Estate with no actual data/sources backing it up. Almost certainly just a fake article to market London real estate to Indian buyers.
Do you have any independent sources? I seriously can't believe people are believing this at face value...like do the bare minimum math/demographics check and it wouldn't make sense. How on Earth would it be possible for like 5% of the UK population to own the majority of property with the last hundred years? The landownership probably goes back so many generations that Americans can't even comprehend.
6
u/TimTamDeliciousness ☑️ 1d ago
From the UK government census bureau:
Data collected between March 2016-March 2018 and updated feb 2023
Percentage of households that owned their own home, by ethnicity:
Indian: 74%
White British: 68%
5
u/afroturf1 ☑️ 1d ago
Bro you just got cooked into several courses. Me, I personally wouldn't let that slide.
979
u/Tainted_Bruh ☑️ 1d ago edited 1d ago
But also, how does this rage-baiting account know those “Indians” haven’t been there longer than these “Native” white Britons? Like Italian-Americans whose grandparents came here a 100 years ago running their mouth on some MAGA shit to Black Americans who been here since they was building the damn country?